Evaluation of a New Primer In Comparison With Microscopy for the Detection of Giardia lamblia Infection in Stool Samples

  • Amir BAIRAMI Dept. of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
  • Sasan REZAEI Dept. of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Mostafa REZAEIAN Mail Dept. of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran AND Center for Research of Endemic Parasites of Iran (CREPI), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Evaluation, PCR, Detection, Giardia lamblia, Stool


Background: Among the most important parasitic disease, causing diarrhea, Gi­ardia lamblia is noteworthy. Nowadays detection methods for these parasites in­clude parasitological methods such as microscopic examination. The sensitivity of these methods relies on the expertise and experience of examiners. In contrast, molecular methods such as PCR are less dependent on the expertise of the exam­iner. Here we developed a PCR for the detection of G. lamblia genome in stool samples in comparison with microscopy, which is the gold standard.

Methods:  For the evaluation of primers, 22 positive samples and 47 negative samples were used. QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germany) was used for DNA extraction from feces. Primers for PCR were designed using Primer-BLAST which uses Primer 3 to designing specific primers (NCBI/ Primer-BLAST).

Results: Sensitivity of the PCR was done with 100% (95%CI: 84.56-100) for the detection of G. lamblia DNA isolated from patients stool samples which were posi­tive for G. lamblia cysts and/or trophozoites using microscopy as gold standard. In comparison with microscopy, PCR had showed the specificity of 97.87% (95%CI: 88.71-99.95).

Conclusion: We designed new primers for the Giardia, and PCR method for the rapid and accurate identification of Giardia parasites established. With considera­tion to the routine diagnosis techniques in medical parasitology and their limita­tions such as time consuming, laborious, less sensitivity etc. This G. lamblia PCR is a sensitive and specific application for the diagnosis of G. lamblia and provides us a reliable method in the routine intestinal parasitic infection laboratory diagnosis.


Thompson RC, Hopkins RM, Homan WL. Nomenclature and genetic groupings of Giardia infecting mammals. Parasitol Today. 2000;16(5):210-3.

Verweij JJ, Schinkel J, Laeijendecker D, van Rooyen MA, van Lieshout L, Polderman AM. Real-time PCR for the detection of Giardia lamblia. Mol Cell Probes. 2003;17(5):223-5.

Koehler AV, Jex AR, Haydon SR, Stevens MA, Gasser RB. Giardia/giardiasis – a perspective on diagnostic and analytical tools. Biotechnol Adv. 2014; 32(2):280-9.

Hanson KL, Cartwright CP. Use of an enzyme immunoassay does not eliminate the need to analyze multiple stool specimens for sensitive detection of Giardia lamblia. J Clin Microbiol. 2001; 39:474–7.

Thompson RCA, Monis PT. Variation in Giar¬dia: implications for taxonomy and epidemiolo¬gy. Adv Parasitol. 2004; 58:69–137.

Gasser RB. Molecular tools--advances, opportunities and prospects. Vet Parasitol. 2006 15;136(2):69-89.

Ye J, Coulouris G, Zaretskaya I, Cutcutache I, Rozen S, Madden TL. Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012; 13:134.

Veterinary parasitology; researchers from Uni¬versity College Dublin describe findings in vet¬erinary parasitology. 2012. Life Science Weekly, 146. Retrieved from


McHardy IH, Wu M, Shimizu-Cohen R, Cou¬turier MR, Humphries RM. Detection of Intes¬tinal protozoa in the clinical laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 2014; 52(3):712-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02877-13. Epub 2013 Nov 6.

Alles AJ, Waldron MA, Sierra LS, Mattia AR. 1995. Prospective comparison of direct immu¬nofluorescence and conventional staining methods for detection of Giardia and Cryptospor¬idium spp. in human fecal specimens. J Clin Mi-crobiol. 33:1632–1634.

Franzen O, Jerlström-Hultqvist J, Castro E, et al. 2009. Draft genome sequenc¬ing of Giardia intestinalis assemblage B isolate GS: is human giardiasis caused by two different species? PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5 (8) 5:e1000560. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000560.

Jerlstrom-Hultqvist J, Ankarklev J, Svard SG. 2010. Is human giardiasis caused by two differ¬ent Giardia species? Gut Microbes. 1:379 –382.

Lebbad M. 2010. Molecular diagnosis and characterization of two intestinal protozoa: En¬tamoeba histolytica and Giardia intestinalis. Ph.D. thesis. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Swe¬den.

Thompson RCA. 2000. Giardiasis as a re-emerging infectious disease and its zoonotic potential. Int J Parasitol. 30:1259 –1267.

How to Cite
BAIRAMI A, REZAEI S, REZAEIAN M. Evaluation of a New Primer In Comparison With Microscopy for the Detection of Giardia lamblia Infection in Stool Samples. Iran J Parasitol. 11(1):19-23.
Original Article(s)