Social Network Analysis of Iranian Researchers on Medical Parasitology: A 41 Year Co-Authorship Survey
AbstractBackground: The aim of this study was to survey the Iranian Parasitology researchers’ performance, and analyse and visualize the scientific outputs of their co-authorship network.Methods: This study was conducted using scientometric method and social network analysis (SNA). The data extracted from the Web of Science (WoS) databases in July 10th 2014. Totally, 1048documents of all types in research area of Parasitology during 1972-2013 by Iranian researches retrieved. The co-authorship map was drawn utilizing NETDRAW, Coauthor.exe, and UCINET softwares and was analysed based on SNA measures.Results: The researchers’ co-authorship network consisted of 78 authors and its density degree is 0.57. “Mohebali” ranked top in all of centrality measures.The most of the publications were related to 2012, “Mohebali” with about 9% of all documents was the Iranian most prolific author in Parasitology field. The Iranian researches have published mostly (266 documents) in “Iranian Journal of Parasitology”, and the most of the documents belong to “Tropical Medicine” subject field. The most of Iranian researchers’ scientific cooperation was performed with England and United States.Conclusion: Bringing forth density degree (is 0.57) showed that this network has an almost medium density. Indeed, the authors have had relations in moderate level with each other in the network. The findings of this study can be identified aspects of scientific collaboration, and help policy makers of Parasitology field research.
Osareh F, Khademi R, Rostami MK, Shirazi MS. Co-authorship Network Structure Analysis of Iranian Researchers’ scientific outputs from 1991 to 2013 based on the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI). Collnet J Scientometr Info Manag. 2014;8(2):263-71.
Garfield E, Merton RK. Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities: Wiley New York; 1979.
Liu X, Bollen J, Nelson ML, Van de Sompel H. Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Info Process Manag. 2005;41(6):1462-80.
Kim H, Yoon JW. How to Compare the Scientific Contributions between Research Groups. arXiv preprint arXiv:09110050. 2009; Oct 31.
Emirbayer M. Manifesto for a relational sociology 1. Am J Sociol. 1997;103(2):281-317.
Yang B, Liu Z, Meloche JA. Visualization of the Chinese academic web based on social network analysis. J Inform Sci. 2010.
Zare-Farashbandi F, Geraei E, Siamaki S. Study of co-authorship network of papers in the Journal of Research in Medical Sciences using social network analysis. J Res Med Sci. 2014;19(1):41-46.
Racherla P, Hu C. A social network perspective of tourism research collaborations. Ann Tour Res. 2010;37(4):1012-34.
Pandia MK, Bihari A. Important Author Analysis in Research Professionals’ Relationship Network Based on Social Network Analysis Metrics. Computational Intelligence in Data Mining-Volume 3: Springer; 2015. p. 185-94.
Otte E, Rousseau R. Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. J Inform Sci. 2002;28(6):441-53.
Freeman LC. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Networks. 1979;1(3):215-39.
Badar K, Hite JM, Badir YF. Examining the relationship of co-authorship network centrality and gender on academic research performance: the case of chemistry researchers in Pakistan. Scientometrics. 2013;94(2):755-75.
Divakarmurthy P, Menezes R. The effect of citations to collaboration networks. Complex Networks: Springer; 2013. p. 177-85.
Ghafouri HB, Mohammadhassanzadeh H, Shokraneh F, Vakilian M, Farahmand S. Social network analysis of Iranian researchers on emergency medicine: a sociogram analysis. Emerg Med J. 2014;31(8):619-24.
Shekofteh M, Hariri N. Scientific mapping of medicine in Iran using subject category co-citation and socialn network analysis. J Health Admin. 2013;16(51):43-59.
Erfanmanesh MA, Rohani VA, Basirian Jahromi R, Gholamhosseinzadeh Z. Investigating Scientific Collaboration of Iranian Psychology and Psychiatry Researchers. J Info Process Manag. 2014;29(1):137-63.
Khasseh A, Fakhar M, Soosaraei M, Sadeghi S. Evaluation of scientific performance of Iranian researchers in parasitology domain in ISI databases. Iran J Med Microbiol. 2011;4(4):41-50.
Savanur K, Srikanth R. Modified collaborative coefficient: A new measure for quantifying the degree of research collaboration. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):365-71.
Ajiferuke I, Burell Q, Tague J. Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics. 1988;14(5-6):421-33.
Erma N, Todorovski L, editors. Co-authorship network analysis in the E-government research field. Proc EGOV; 2010.
Osareh F, Serati Shirazi M, Khademi R. A Survey on Co-authorship Network of Iranian Researchers in the field of Pharmacy and Pharmacology in Web of Science during 2000-2012. J Health Admin. 2014;17(56):33-45.
Osareh F, Norouzi Chakoli A, Keshvari M. Co-authorship of Iranian researchers in science, social science, art and humanities citation indexes in the web of science between 2000 and 2006. J Info Sci Technol. 2010;25(4):573-95.
Galyani Maghaddam G, Moballeghi M. Co-Authorship and Scientific Publications: A Case Study at Shahed University. Ser Libr. 2012;63(3-4):370-9.
Hariri N, Nikzad M. Co-authorship networks of Iranian articles in library and information science, psychology, management and economics in ISI during 2000-2009. J Info Proc Manag. 2011;26(4):825-44.
Heydari M, Safavi Z. The survey of Collaborative Coefficient of article authors in “Journal of Research in Medical Sciences” since 2007 to 2011. Res in Med. 2012; 36 (2) :109-113.
Marefat R, Saberi M, Abdolmajid A, Zoodranj M. A survey on collaboration rate of authors in presenting scientific papers in Koomesh journal during 1999-2010. Koomesh. 2012;13(3):Pe279-Pe85, En37. (In Persian).
Edrisian G. Final report of research project of Iranian parasitology database. Tehran: Iranian Academy of Medical Sciences, 2014.