Differential Detection of Echinococcus Spp. Copro-DNA by Nested-PCR in Domestic and Wild Definitive Hosts in Moghan Plain, Iran.

  • I Mobedi Dept. of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • M Zare-Bidaki Immunology of Infectious Diseases Research Center (IIDRC), Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
  • Mr Siavashi Department of Medical Parasitology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
  • Sr Naddaf Department of Medical Parasitology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
  • Eb Kia Dept. of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • M Mahmoudi Dept. of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Keywords: Canids, Copro-DNA, Echinococcus, Iran

Abstract

 Background: Despite Echinococcus granulosus, there are merely two old reports of E. multilocularis in-fection among Iranian canids of Moghan Plain, the only area known endemic for the species. We detected specific DNA markers in fecal samples by PCR (Copro-PCR) for differential diagnosis of Echinococcus species in living canids. Methods: Totally 144 fecal samples from domestic dogs, red foxes and a golden jackal were exam-ined for genus-specific Echinococcus coproantigens using ELISA. Forty two positive or ambiguous samples were further examined for Echinococcus species-specific DNA markers by two different set of nested-PCR. Results: Twenty five out of 144 (17.4%) animals were contaminated with E. granulosus including 14 (23.7%) domestic dogs, 10 (11.9%) red foxes and one (100%) golden jackal. But none of them har-boured E. multilocularis species-specific Copro-DNA. The overall prevalence of E. granulosus and E. multilocularis infections in canids of the area was estimated to be 17.4% and 0.0%, respectively. There was a significant relation between the results of Copro-PCR and CA-ELISA. Conclusion: The lack of E. multilocularis infection, compared to previous reports may be due to the differences in used diagnostic methods and/or recently limited territories of wild canids and altered their food resources in this particular area.

References

Zhang W, Li J, McManus DP. Concepts in immunology and diagnosis of hydatid disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16(1):18-36.

Eckert J, Gemmell MA, Meslin F-X, Pawłowski ZS. WHO/OIE Manual on Echinococcosis in Humans and Animals: a Public Health Problem of Global Concern. World Organisation for Animal Health, World Health Organization; 2001.

Rokni MB. The present status of human hel-minthic diseases in Iran. Ann Trop Med Parasit. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Par-asitology 2008; 102(4):283-95.

Eslami A, Hosseini SH. Echinococcus granulosus infection of farm dogs of Iran. Parasitol Res. 1998; 84(3):205-7.

Sadjjadi SM. Present situation of ech-inococcosis in the Middle East and Arabic North Africa. Parasitol Int. 2006 ;55 Suppl:S197-202.

Zare-Bidaki M, Mobedi I, Naddaf SR, Kia EB, Mahmoudi M, Piazak N, et al. Prevalence of Echinococcus spp. Infection Using Coproantigen ELISA among Canids of Moghan Plain, Iran. Iran J Public Health. 2009; 38(1):112-8.

Mobedi I, Bray RA, Arfaa F, Movafag K. A study on the cestodes of carnivores in the northwest of Iran. J Helminthol. 1973; 97(3):277-81.

Mobedi I, Sadighian A. Echinococcus multilocularis, Leukrart 1863, in red foxes, Vulpes vulpes, in Moghan, Azarbaijan province, north west Iran. J Parasitol. 1971; 58:493.

Zarriffard MR. A study on helminthic para-sites of wild carnivorous of east Azarbaijan with emphasis on Echinococcus multilocularis. Tehran: PhD Thesis, Tehran University of Medical Sciences; 1993.

Zariffard MR, Massoud J. Study of Echinococcus granulosus and Echinococcus multilocularis infec-tions in Canidiae in Ardabile province of Iran. Arch Razi Inst. 1998; 48/49:47-52.

Dinkel A, von Nickisch-Rosenegk M, Bilger B, Merli M, Lucius R, Romig T. Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in the definitive host: coprodiagnosis by PCR as an alternative to necropsy. J Clin Microbiol. 1998; 36(7):1871-6.

Craig p, Pawlowski Z. Cestode zoonoses: echinococcosis and cysticercosis: an emergent and global problem. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press; 2002.

Bretagne S, Guillou JP, Morand M, Houin R. Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis DNA in fox faeces using DNA amplification. Parasit-ology. 1993;106 ( Pt 2):193-9.

Mathis A, Deplazes P, Eckert J. An improved test system for PCR-based specific detection of Echinococcus multilocularis eggs. J Helminthol. 1996; 70(3):219-22.

Monnier P, Cliquet F, Aubert M, Bretagne S. Improvement of a polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Echinococcus multilocularis DNA in faecal samples of foxes. Vet Parasitol. 1996; 67(3-4):185-95.

Smith GC, Gangadharan B, Taylor Z, Laurenson MK, Bradshaw H, Hide G, et al. Prevalence of zoonotic important parasites in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in Great Britain. Vet Parasitol. 2003; 118(1-2):133-42.

van der Giessen JW, Rombout YB, Franchimont JH, Limper LP, Homan WL. Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in foxes in The Netherlands. Vet Parasitol. 1999; 82(1):49-57.

Stefanic S, Shaikenov BS, Deplazes P, Dinkel A, Torgerson PR, Mathis A. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of patent infections of Echinococcus granulosus (“sheep strain”) in natu-rally infected dogs. Parasitol Res. 2004; 92(4):347-51.

Zhang Y, Bart JM, Giraudoux P, Craig P, Vuitton D, Wen H. Morphological and mo-lecular characteristics of Echinococcus mult-ilocularis and Echinococcus granulosus mixed infec-tion in a dog from Xinjiang, China. Vet Parasitol. 2006; 139(1-3):244-8.

Trachsel D, Deplazes P, Mathis A. Identifica-tion of taeniid eggs in the faeces from carni-vores based on multiplex PCR using targets in mitochondrial DNA. Parasitology. 2007; 134(Pt 6):911-20.

Dyachenko V, Beck E, Pantchev N, Bauer C. Cost-effective method of DNA extraction from taeniid eggs. Parasitol Res. 2008; 102(4):811-3.

Knapp J, Guislain MH, Bart JM, Raoul F, Gottstein B, Giraudoux P, et al. Genetic diver-sity of Echinococcus multilocularis on a local scale. Infect Genet Evol. 2008; 8(3):367-73.

Abbasi I, Branzburg A, Campos-Ponce M, Abdel Hafez SK, Raoul F, Craig PS, et al. Copro-diagnosis of Echinococcus granulosus infec-tion in dogs by amplification of a newly identi-fied repeated DNA sequence. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003; 69(3):324-30.

Siavashi MR, Motamedi GR. Evaluation of a coproantigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of canine echinococcosis in Iran. Helminthologia. 1996; 43(1):17–9.

Eckert J. Predictive values and quality control of techniques for the diagnosis of Echinococcus multilocularis in definitive hosts. Acta Trop. 2003; 85(2):157-63.

Zare-Bidaki M, Mobedi I, Ahari SS, Habibizadeh S, Naddaf SR, Siavashi MR. Prevalence of Zoonotic Intestinal Helminths of Canids in Moghan Plain, Northwestern Iran. Iran J Parasitol. 2010; 5(2):42-51.

How to Cite
1.
Mobedi I, Zare-Bidaki M, Siavashi M, Naddaf S, Kia E, Mahmoudi M. Differential Detection of Echinococcus Spp. Copro-DNA by Nested-PCR in Domestic and Wild Definitive Hosts in Moghan Plain, Iran. Iran J Parasitol. 8(1):107-113.
Section
Articles